<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (9) TMI 751 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237319</link>
    <description>The High Court dismissed the income tax appeal, upholding the ITAT&#039;s decision to delete the penalty imposed under Section 271-1C. The court aligned with the Delhi High Court&#039;s judgment, emphasizing that in cases of MAT companies assessed under Section 115-JB, concealment does not result in tax evasion, therefore, the penalty was not justified. The Supreme Court also supported this reasoning, leading to the dismissal of the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 04 Sep 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Sep 2013 07:17:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=199726" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (9) TMI 751 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237319</link>
      <description>The High Court dismissed the income tax appeal, upholding the ITAT&#039;s decision to delete the penalty imposed under Section 271-1C. The court aligned with the Delhi High Court&#039;s judgment, emphasizing that in cases of MAT companies assessed under Section 115-JB, concealment does not result in tax evasion, therefore, the penalty was not justified. The Supreme Court also supported this reasoning, leading to the dismissal of the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Sep 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237319</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>