<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (9) TMI 747 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237315</link>
    <description>The High Court dismissed the appeals filed by the department under section 260-A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 against the consolidated order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal for the assessment years 2005-06 and 2006-07. The appeals were related to the addition made by the Assessing Officer on an estimate basis by applying a net profit rate on total transport/service charges, which the Tribunal had deleted. The Court found no substantial question of law and hence dismissed both appeals at the admission stage.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 02 Sep 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Sep 2013 07:36:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=199722" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (9) TMI 747 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237315</link>
      <description>The High Court dismissed the appeals filed by the department under section 260-A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 against the consolidated order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal for the assessment years 2005-06 and 2006-07. The appeals were related to the addition made by the Assessing Officer on an estimate basis by applying a net profit rate on total transport/service charges, which the Tribunal had deleted. The Court found no substantial question of law and hence dismissed both appeals at the admission stage.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 Sep 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237315</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>