<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (9) TMI 742 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237310</link>
    <description>Delay in presenting the appeal: The High Court condoned a 13-day delay in filing the appeal by the income tax department under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, due to a valid explanation. Interpretation of circulars and judgments regarding tax deduction at source under Section 195: The court examined the reliance on circulars and the retrospective effect of their withdrawal, emphasizing the significance of Circular No.786 and Circular No.30/2009 in determining tax liability under Section 195. Disallowance of expenses under Section 40(a)(ia): The case involved the disallowance of expenses for non-deduction of income tax under Section 195, with rulings in favor of the assessee due to business expediencies and lack of evidence supporting the AO&#039;s position. Applicability of circulars and retrospective effect of circular withdrawal: The judgment favored the assessee, highlighting that the circulars in force at the time of assessment were binding and crucial in determining tax liability.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 10 Sep 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 31 Oct 2013 12:10:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=199717" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (9) TMI 742 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237310</link>
      <description>Delay in presenting the appeal: The High Court condoned a 13-day delay in filing the appeal by the income tax department under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, due to a valid explanation. Interpretation of circulars and judgments regarding tax deduction at source under Section 195: The court examined the reliance on circulars and the retrospective effect of their withdrawal, emphasizing the significance of Circular No.786 and Circular No.30/2009 in determining tax liability under Section 195. Disallowance of expenses under Section 40(a)(ia): The case involved the disallowance of expenses for non-deduction of income tax under Section 195, with rulings in favor of the assessee due to business expediencies and lack of evidence supporting the AO&#039;s position. Applicability of circulars and retrospective effect of circular withdrawal: The judgment favored the assessee, highlighting that the circulars in force at the time of assessment were binding and crucial in determining tax liability.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Sep 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237310</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>