https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237300 The appeal against conviction and sentence under the NDPS Act, involving possession of Heroin at the airport, was considered. The appellant did not challenge the conviction but sought a modification of the sentence due to time served and health condition. The court confirmed the conviction and maintained the sentence at the minimum prescribed, citing previous judgments for reference. The court distinguished between imprisonment for non-payment of fines and substantive sentences, reducing the default sentence and imposing fines. The appeal was disposed of with modified sentence terms, instructing further action to be taken by the Trial Court. en-us Wed, 21 Aug 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 24 Sep 2013 21:03:03 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237300 The appeal against conviction and sentence under the NDPS Act, involving possession of Heroin at the airport, was considered. The appellant did not challenge the conviction but sought a modification of the sentence due to time served and health condition. The court confirmed the conviction and maintained the sentence at the minimum prescribed, citing previous judgments for reference. The court distinguished between imprisonment for non-payment of fines and substantive sentences, reducing the default sentence and imposing fines. The appeal was disposed of with modified sentence terms, instructing further action to be taken by the Trial Court. Case-Laws Customs Wed, 21 Aug 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237300