<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (9) TMI 730 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237298</link>
    <description>The writ petition was dismissed as it was found to be barred by principles similar to res judicata and constructive res judicata, as well as the doctrine of election and estoppel. The court held that the petitioner, having paid the redemption fine and penalty as per the order, could not challenge it later. The respondents&#039; preliminary objection was upheld, leading to the dismissal of the writ petition without costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 19 Sep 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2014 12:05:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=199705" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (9) TMI 730 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237298</link>
      <description>The writ petition was dismissed as it was found to be barred by principles similar to res judicata and constructive res judicata, as well as the doctrine of election and estoppel. The court held that the petitioner, having paid the redemption fine and penalty as per the order, could not challenge it later. The respondents&#039; preliminary objection was upheld, leading to the dismissal of the writ petition without costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Sep 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237298</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>