https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237292 The Court clarified the distinction between cancellation of selection for non-deposit and surrender/cancellation of a granted license under the U.P. Excise Rules, 2002. It highlighted that non-compliance with deposit requirements leads to selection cancellation, not license surrender. The judgment differentiated the case from precedent and emphasized factual distinctions in determining precedential value. The State Government's order was set aside, and the case was remanded for a fresh decision adhering to the Rules within a specified timeframe. The writ petition was allowed, stressing the importance of statutory compliance and procedural correctness in granting retail liquor licenses. en-us Thu, 05 Sep 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 24 Sep 2013 10:34:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237292 The Court clarified the distinction between cancellation of selection for non-deposit and surrender/cancellation of a granted license under the U.P. Excise Rules, 2002. It highlighted that non-compliance with deposit requirements leads to selection cancellation, not license surrender. The judgment differentiated the case from precedent and emphasized factual distinctions in determining precedential value. The State Government's order was set aside, and the case was remanded for a fresh decision adhering to the Rules within a specified timeframe. The writ petition was allowed, stressing the importance of statutory compliance and procedural correctness in granting retail liquor licenses. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 05 Sep 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237292