<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (9) TMI 720 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237288</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the demand and penalties for the periods from 28.9.1996 to 13.5.2003. For the period from 14.5.2003 to 30.6.2004, the matter was remitted to the adjudicating authority for re-quantification of duty, penalties, and interest, considering the inclusion of incidental charges in the assessable value. Other arguments raised by both sides were not addressed by the Tribunal due to the decision on merits for the specified period.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 11 Sep 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 30 May 2015 18:21:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=199695" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (9) TMI 720 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237288</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the demand and penalties for the periods from 28.9.1996 to 13.5.2003. For the period from 14.5.2003 to 30.6.2004, the matter was remitted to the adjudicating authority for re-quantification of duty, penalties, and interest, considering the inclusion of incidental charges in the assessable value. Other arguments raised by both sides were not addressed by the Tribunal due to the decision on merits for the specified period.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 Sep 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237288</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>