<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (9) TMI 696 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237264</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the manufacturing company, allowing Modvat credit for duty paid on components used in manufacturing motor vehicles supplied to International Organizations. It held that the duty exemption for final products did not preclude duty credit for intermediate products, aligning with the clarificatory nature of Notification No. 11/97. The Tribunal supported the retrospective application of the amendment to ensure consistency in duty exemption treatment for supplies to International Organizations, interpreting the notifications harmoniously to achieve the intended exemption. The impugned duty demand was set aside, and the appeal was granted in favor of the appellants.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 03 May 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 11 Nov 2013 12:14:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=199671" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (9) TMI 696 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237264</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the manufacturing company, allowing Modvat credit for duty paid on components used in manufacturing motor vehicles supplied to International Organizations. It held that the duty exemption for final products did not preclude duty credit for intermediate products, aligning with the clarificatory nature of Notification No. 11/97. The Tribunal supported the retrospective application of the amendment to ensure consistency in duty exemption treatment for supplies to International Organizations, interpreting the notifications harmoniously to achieve the intended exemption. The impugned duty demand was set aside, and the appeal was granted in favor of the appellants.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 May 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237264</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>