https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237248 The court dismissed the writ petition, affirming the Transfer Pricing Officer's jurisdiction under sections 92CA(2A) and 92CA(2B) to consider unreported international transactions. It held the sale of the call center business constituted an international transaction due to associated enterprises' involvement. Regarding the alleged assignment of call options, the court noted the need for further assessment under the amended definition of "transfer" in the Income Tax Act. The respondents were directed not to serve certain orders on the petitioner until a specified date. en-us Fri, 06 Sep 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 04 Feb 2014 11:46:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237248 The court dismissed the writ petition, affirming the Transfer Pricing Officer's jurisdiction under sections 92CA(2A) and 92CA(2B) to consider unreported international transactions. It held the sale of the call center business constituted an international transaction due to associated enterprises' involvement. Regarding the alleged assignment of call options, the court noted the need for further assessment under the amended definition of "transfer" in the Income Tax Act. The respondents were directed not to serve certain orders on the petitioner until a specified date. Case-Laws Income Tax Fri, 06 Sep 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237248