<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (9) TMI 670 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237238</link>
    <description>Contractual terms and actual broadcast operations indicated that a foreign service provider was engaged to produce live audio-visual coverage of cricket matches, including setting up the control room, deploying cameras and commentators, processing the feed, and delivering the telecast. On a prima facie reading, the arrangement fell within programme producer service, and recipient liability under the reverse charge mechanism was attracted because the service providers were non-residents. Complete waiver of pre-deposit was therefore not accepted, and only partial waiver with deposit of the balance was directed during the pendency of the appeals.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 06 Aug 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Sep 2013 15:06:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=199645" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (9) TMI 670 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237238</link>
      <description>Contractual terms and actual broadcast operations indicated that a foreign service provider was engaged to produce live audio-visual coverage of cricket matches, including setting up the control room, deploying cameras and commentators, processing the feed, and delivering the telecast. On a prima facie reading, the arrangement fell within programme producer service, and recipient liability under the reverse charge mechanism was attracted because the service providers were non-residents. Complete waiver of pre-deposit was therefore not accepted, and only partial waiver with deposit of the balance was directed during the pendency of the appeals.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 Aug 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237238</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>