<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (9) TMI 669 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237237</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the CESTAT&#039;s decision, requiring the appellant to deposit 35% of the disputed CENVAT credit. The court clarified that this deposit was only a fraction of the total liability, pending appeal. The appeal was dismissed, emphasizing that the judgment&#039;s observations would not impact the case&#039;s merits during the final hearing at CESTAT.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 05 Sep 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 11 Feb 2014 11:24:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=199644" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (9) TMI 669 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237237</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the CESTAT&#039;s decision, requiring the appellant to deposit 35% of the disputed CENVAT credit. The court clarified that this deposit was only a fraction of the total liability, pending appeal. The appeal was dismissed, emphasizing that the judgment&#039;s observations would not impact the case&#039;s merits during the final hearing at CESTAT.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Sep 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237237</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>