<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (9) TMI 663 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237231</link>
    <description>The court upheld the decision of the Settlement Commission, ruling in favor of the respondents and dismissing the Writ Petition. The judgment emphasized the necessity of complying with statutory requirements, particularly highlighting the mandatory filing of a Baggage Declaration Form as a prerequisite for seeking settlement under the Customs Act, 1962.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 30 Aug 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 07 Feb 2014 12:46:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=199638" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (9) TMI 663 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237231</link>
      <description>The court upheld the decision of the Settlement Commission, ruling in favor of the respondents and dismissing the Writ Petition. The judgment emphasized the necessity of complying with statutory requirements, particularly highlighting the mandatory filing of a Baggage Declaration Form as a prerequisite for seeking settlement under the Customs Act, 1962.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Aug 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237231</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>