<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (9) TMI 663 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237231</link>
    <description>Settlement jurisdiction under Section 127B(1) of the Customs Act depends on satisfaction of the statutory proviso conditions, including production of the required import document. The Bombay HC held that import of goods as baggage did not by itself prove filing of a Baggage Declaration Form, and the applicant had not produced such proof before the Settlement Commission. Because the requisite declaration was not shown, the Commission was justified in declining to entertain the settlement application, and the challenge failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 30 Aug 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 07 Feb 2014 12:46:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=199638" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (9) TMI 663 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237231</link>
      <description>Settlement jurisdiction under Section 127B(1) of the Customs Act depends on satisfaction of the statutory proviso conditions, including production of the required import document. The Bombay HC held that import of goods as baggage did not by itself prove filing of a Baggage Declaration Form, and the applicant had not produced such proof before the Settlement Commission. Because the requisite declaration was not shown, the Commission was justified in declining to entertain the settlement application, and the challenge failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Aug 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237231</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>