<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (9) TMI 662 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237230</link>
    <description>The appeal was dismissed, and the exemption application was granted subject to exceptions. The delay in filing the appeal was condoned. The court upheld the auction sale, noting the Customs Department&#039;s failure to identify confiscated goods, leading to the appeal&#039;s failure. The court found the Customs Department negligent and dismissed the appeal without costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 26 Aug 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Sep 2013 12:08:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=199637" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (9) TMI 662 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237230</link>
      <description>The appeal was dismissed, and the exemption application was granted subject to exceptions. The delay in filing the appeal was condoned. The court upheld the auction sale, noting the Customs Department&#039;s failure to identify confiscated goods, leading to the appeal&#039;s failure. The court found the Customs Department negligent and dismissed the appeal without costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 26 Aug 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237230</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>