https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237221 The Court dismissed the writ petition challenging a demand notice for excise license dues under the U.P. Excise Act. The petitioner's involvement in licensing activities and financial dealings, including depositing fees on behalf of license holders, rendered him liable for repaying refunded amounts. The Court criticized the petitioner's actions in subletting a liquor license and running a business benami, emphasizing his direct involvement in licensing processes and financial transactions. Despite complex financial arrangements, the Court held the petitioner responsible for the dues, rejecting his attempts to evade repayment. en-us Tue, 10 Sep 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 21 Sep 2013 11:40:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237221 The Court dismissed the writ petition challenging a demand notice for excise license dues under the U.P. Excise Act. The petitioner's involvement in licensing activities and financial dealings, including depositing fees on behalf of license holders, rendered him liable for repaying refunded amounts. The Court criticized the petitioner's actions in subletting a liquor license and running a business benami, emphasizing his direct involvement in licensing processes and financial transactions. Despite complex financial arrangements, the Court held the petitioner responsible for the dues, rejecting his attempts to evade repayment. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 10 Sep 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237221