<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (9) TMI 641 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237209</link>
    <description>The Tribunal remitted issues related to section 2(22)(e) back to the Commissioner (Appeals) for fresh consideration, upholding disallowances under sections 40A(3), commission and brokerage expenses, and levelling and fencing charges due to insufficient evidence provided by the assessee. The Revenue&#039;s appeals were allowed for statistical purposes. The order was pronounced on October 5, 2012.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 05 Oct 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 May 2016 10:21:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=199616" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (9) TMI 641 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237209</link>
      <description>The Tribunal remitted issues related to section 2(22)(e) back to the Commissioner (Appeals) for fresh consideration, upholding disallowances under sections 40A(3), commission and brokerage expenses, and levelling and fencing charges due to insufficient evidence provided by the assessee. The Revenue&#039;s appeals were allowed for statistical purposes. The order was pronounced on October 5, 2012.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Oct 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237209</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>