<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (9) TMI 638 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237206</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the Commissioner of Income-tax (CIT) lacked jurisdiction under Section 263 to revise the assessment order as the issue had already been considered by the CIT(A). Additionally, the Tribunal found the Assessing Officer&#039;s view was legally valid, not erroneous, or prejudicial to Revenue interests. Consequently, the Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal on jurisdictional grounds without addressing the merits of the deduction eligibility issue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Sep 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Sep 2013 08:05:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=199613" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (9) TMI 638 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237206</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the Commissioner of Income-tax (CIT) lacked jurisdiction under Section 263 to revise the assessment order as the issue had already been considered by the CIT(A). Additionally, the Tribunal found the Assessing Officer&#039;s view was legally valid, not erroneous, or prejudicial to Revenue interests. Consequently, the Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal on jurisdictional grounds without addressing the merits of the deduction eligibility issue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Sep 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237206</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>