<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (9) TMI 636 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237204</link>
    <description>The Tribunal determined the fair market value (FMV) of the land as Rs. 3.50 lakhs per acre as of April 1, 1981, considering evidence from the Patwari&#039;s certificate, Tehsildar&#039;s report, and the principle of consistency. The appeal was partly allowed, criticizing the Assessing Officer and Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) for their contradictory and unsupported valuation methods, emphasizing the need for alignment with legislative intent and factual circumstances.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Sep 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 Oct 2013 17:55:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=199611" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (9) TMI 636 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237204</link>
      <description>The Tribunal determined the fair market value (FMV) of the land as Rs. 3.50 lakhs per acre as of April 1, 1981, considering evidence from the Patwari&#039;s certificate, Tehsildar&#039;s report, and the principle of consistency. The appeal was partly allowed, criticizing the Assessing Officer and Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) for their contradictory and unsupported valuation methods, emphasizing the need for alignment with legislative intent and factual circumstances.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Sep 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237204</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>