https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237195 The Tribunal deemed the application for review of the Stay Order under Section 35C(2) of the Central Excise Act as not maintainable, as the original order was passed under Section 35F. It emphasized the limited power of review for modification of stay orders and the option to appeal to the High Court if aggrieved. The appellant was granted eight weeks to pre-deposit the balance amount for justice, with compliance required by a specified date. The judgment stressed adherence to legal provisions and procedures, considering financial hardships within statutory remedies. en-us Fri, 01 Mar 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 20 Sep 2013 10:23:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237195 The Tribunal deemed the application for review of the Stay Order under Section 35C(2) of the Central Excise Act as not maintainable, as the original order was passed under Section 35F. It emphasized the limited power of review for modification of stay orders and the option to appeal to the High Court if aggrieved. The appellant was granted eight weeks to pre-deposit the balance amount for justice, with compliance required by a specified date. The judgment stressed adherence to legal provisions and procedures, considering financial hardships within statutory remedies. Case-Laws Service Tax Fri, 01 Mar 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237195