<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (9) TMI 625 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237193</link>
    <description>The appellate tribunal directed M/s. Sarth India Ltd. to make a pre-deposit to cover the outstanding tax amount and report compliance to the adjudicating authority. The eligibility for Cenvat credit was referred back to the adjudicating authority for further examination. The tribunal emphasized the importance of fulfilling tax obligations and avoiding fraudulent practices. Penalties under Sections 76, 77 &amp;amp; 78 of the Finance Act were upheld, and the appellant was directed to comply with the payment requirements.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Sep 2013 10:22:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=199600" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (9) TMI 625 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237193</link>
      <description>The appellate tribunal directed M/s. Sarth India Ltd. to make a pre-deposit to cover the outstanding tax amount and report compliance to the adjudicating authority. The eligibility for Cenvat credit was referred back to the adjudicating authority for further examination. The tribunal emphasized the importance of fulfilling tax obligations and avoiding fraudulent practices. Penalties under Sections 76, 77 &amp;amp; 78 of the Finance Act were upheld, and the appellant was directed to comply with the payment requirements.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237193</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>