<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (9) TMI 620 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237188</link>
    <description>The appeal was filed against an order imposing a penalty for delayed filing of the Consol General Manifest (CGM) in 1118 cases. The appellant failed to comply with the pre-deposit requirement, resulting in the dismissal of the appeal. The appellant contended that the delay was only in 20 cases and expressed willingness to make a reduced pre-deposit. The Tribunal directed the appellant to comply with the pre-deposit, after which the Commissioner (Appeals) would hear the appeal on its merits. The appeal and stay application were disposed of, resolving the issues raised regarding the penalty and non-compliance with the pre-deposit requirement.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 07 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Sep 2013 10:16:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=199595" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (9) TMI 620 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237188</link>
      <description>The appeal was filed against an order imposing a penalty for delayed filing of the Consol General Manifest (CGM) in 1118 cases. The appellant failed to comply with the pre-deposit requirement, resulting in the dismissal of the appeal. The appellant contended that the delay was only in 20 cases and expressed willingness to make a reduced pre-deposit. The Tribunal directed the appellant to comply with the pre-deposit, after which the Commissioner (Appeals) would hear the appeal on its merits. The appeal and stay application were disposed of, resolving the issues raised regarding the penalty and non-compliance with the pre-deposit requirement.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 07 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237188</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>