<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (9) TMI 619 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237187</link>
    <description>The appeal was allowed by the Tribunal, setting aside the impugned order and restoring the lower assessing authority&#039;s decision. The Tribunal found that the technical assistance and royalty agreement did not influence the transaction value of the imported goods. The decision was supported by the comparability of prices with similar supplies to importers in other countries, as no evidence was presented to show that the declared price did not reflect the true value.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 07 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 10 Feb 2014 10:05:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=199594" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (9) TMI 619 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237187</link>
      <description>The appeal was allowed by the Tribunal, setting aside the impugned order and restoring the lower assessing authority&#039;s decision. The Tribunal found that the technical assistance and royalty agreement did not influence the transaction value of the imported goods. The decision was supported by the comparability of prices with similar supplies to importers in other countries, as no evidence was presented to show that the declared price did not reflect the true value.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 07 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237187</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>