<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (9) TMI 618 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237186</link>
    <description>Modvat credit was held admissible where inputs were sent directly to job workers and the return of processed goods was supported by prescribed job work challans and records; separate transport documents were not required when the documentary trail otherwise established receipt back in the factory. Interest was also held payable on a pre-deposit made during appellate proceedings once the assessee succeeded and the refund was not granted in time, because the deposit was only a condition for pursuing the appeal and not final duty payment. The Revenue&#039;s challenge failed, while the assessee obtained consequential refund relief on the pre-deposit.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Sep 2013 10:13:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=199593" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (9) TMI 618 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237186</link>
      <description>Modvat credit was held admissible where inputs were sent directly to job workers and the return of processed goods was supported by prescribed job work challans and records; separate transport documents were not required when the documentary trail otherwise established receipt back in the factory. Interest was also held payable on a pre-deposit made during appellate proceedings once the assessee succeeded and the refund was not granted in time, because the deposit was only a condition for pursuing the appeal and not final duty payment. The Revenue&#039;s challenge failed, while the assessee obtained consequential refund relief on the pre-deposit.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237186</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>