<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (9) TMI 616 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237184</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the confiscation of unaccounted raw materials under Rule 25(1)(b) of the Central Excise Rules, 2002, as they were intended for clandestine removal. Penalties imposed on the appellant and its director under Rules 25 and 26 were upheld due to non-accountal and intent to evade duty. The Tribunal found the actions in violation of the law and dismissed the appeals, affirming the lower authorities&#039; orders.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Dec 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Sep 2013 10:11:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=199591" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (9) TMI 616 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237184</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the confiscation of unaccounted raw materials under Rule 25(1)(b) of the Central Excise Rules, 2002, as they were intended for clandestine removal. Penalties imposed on the appellant and its director under Rules 25 and 26 were upheld due to non-accountal and intent to evade duty. The Tribunal found the actions in violation of the law and dismissed the appeals, affirming the lower authorities&#039; orders.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Dec 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237184</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>