<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (9) TMI 600 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237168</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed both appeals. It confirmed the non-compete fees as capital expenditure but allowed depreciation on it. The SEBI fees were fully allowed as revenue expenditure. The addition for service tax was deleted, and the disallowance of depreciation on the payment under the transfer of business agreement was upheld. The order was pronounced on August 31, 2012.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 31 Aug 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Aug 2016 14:21:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=199575" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (9) TMI 600 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237168</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed both appeals. It confirmed the non-compete fees as capital expenditure but allowed depreciation on it. The SEBI fees were fully allowed as revenue expenditure. The addition for service tax was deleted, and the disallowance of depreciation on the payment under the transfer of business agreement was upheld. The order was pronounced on August 31, 2012.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 31 Aug 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237168</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>