<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (9) TMI 582 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237150</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the penalty imposed on the appellant under Rule 26 of the Central Excise Rules, referencing the precedent in S.K. Colombowala. The Tribunal concluded that the settlement of the main noticee&#039;s case should also end the penal proceedings against co-noticees, including the appellant, effectively nullifying the Rs. 5 lakhs penalty.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 01 Aug 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Sep 2013 11:45:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=199557" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (9) TMI 582 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237150</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the penalty imposed on the appellant under Rule 26 of the Central Excise Rules, referencing the precedent in S.K. Colombowala. The Tribunal concluded that the settlement of the main noticee&#039;s case should also end the penal proceedings against co-noticees, including the appellant, effectively nullifying the Rs. 5 lakhs penalty.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Aug 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237150</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>