https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237143 The Tribunal set aside the non-speaking order confirming a demand of approximately Rs. 3.58 crores under the Central Excise Act, 1944, and imposing fines and penalties. The adjudicating authority's failure to comply with directions, lack of proper consideration of evidence, and discrepancies in the adjudication order led to the decision. The matter was remanded for fresh consideration, emphasizing the necessity for a reasoned decision based on a thorough evaluation of evidence and adherence to legal principles and procedural fairness. en-us Wed, 02 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 18 Sep 2013 08:14:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237143 The Tribunal set aside the non-speaking order confirming a demand of approximately Rs. 3.58 crores under the Central Excise Act, 1944, and imposing fines and penalties. The adjudicating authority's failure to comply with directions, lack of proper consideration of evidence, and discrepancies in the adjudication order led to the decision. The matter was remanded for fresh consideration, emphasizing the necessity for a reasoned decision based on a thorough evaluation of evidence and adherence to legal principles and procedural fairness. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 02 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237143