https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237134 Disclosure of the satisfaction note and related intelligence material was held to be barred where it would prejudice public interest by exposing the source, method and manner of collection of sensitive financial intelligence. The Court accepted that the material had been received, processed and analysed by the Financial Intelligence Unit, and that revealing it could compromise the agency's effectiveness and security. The privilege claim was found bona fide and validly invoked under the Evidence Act, so the Income-tax Department was not required to disclose the satisfaction note to the petitioner. en-us Thu, 12 Sep 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 31 Jan 2014 17:04:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237134 Disclosure of the satisfaction note and related intelligence material was held to be barred where it would prejudice public interest by exposing the source, method and manner of collection of sensitive financial intelligence. The Court accepted that the material had been received, processed and analysed by the Financial Intelligence Unit, and that revealing it could compromise the agency's effectiveness and security. The privilege claim was found bona fide and validly invoked under the Evidence Act, so the Income-tax Department was not required to disclose the satisfaction note to the petitioner. Case-Laws Income Tax Thu, 12 Sep 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237134