<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (9) TMI 554 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237122</link>
    <description>The judgment confirmed the demand of service tax amounting to Rs.70,02,83,057 against the applicant for the period from 14.5.2003 to 31.3.2008, along with penalties under various sections of the Finance Act, 1994. The confirmation was based on the appellant providing services falling under the category of &#039;Technical Testing and Analysis Agency,&#039; making them liable for service tax. Despite the Revenue&#039;s allegations of suppression, the tribunal found no evidence of malafide intent or facts suppression by the appellant, allowing the stay petition unconditionally and indicating a prima facie case on the issue of limitation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 05 Mar 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Sep 2013 08:36:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=199529" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (9) TMI 554 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237122</link>
      <description>The judgment confirmed the demand of service tax amounting to Rs.70,02,83,057 against the applicant for the period from 14.5.2003 to 31.3.2008, along with penalties under various sections of the Finance Act, 1994. The confirmation was based on the appellant providing services falling under the category of &#039;Technical Testing and Analysis Agency,&#039; making them liable for service tax. Despite the Revenue&#039;s allegations of suppression, the tribunal found no evidence of malafide intent or facts suppression by the appellant, allowing the stay petition unconditionally and indicating a prima facie case on the issue of limitation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Mar 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237122</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>