<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (9) TMI 542 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237110</link>
    <description>The appeal by M/s Havells Industries Ltd. challenged a penalty imposed by the Commissioner for not specifying trade discounts on invoices. The Department demanded duty, interest, and penalties, which the appellants argued were time-barred. The Commissioner&#039;s acknowledgment of the discount disclosure to the Department led to the finding that the demand exceeded the time limitation. The Tribunal agreed, setting aside the order on grounds of limitation. This case underscores the importance of timely disclosure to tax authorities and the impact on extended demand periods, emphasizing transparency in business transactions to avoid tax disputes and penalties.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Sep 2013 07:55:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=199517" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (9) TMI 542 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237110</link>
      <description>The appeal by M/s Havells Industries Ltd. challenged a penalty imposed by the Commissioner for not specifying trade discounts on invoices. The Department demanded duty, interest, and penalties, which the appellants argued were time-barred. The Commissioner&#039;s acknowledgment of the discount disclosure to the Department led to the finding that the demand exceeded the time limitation. The Tribunal agreed, setting aside the order on grounds of limitation. This case underscores the importance of timely disclosure to tax authorities and the impact on extended demand periods, emphasizing transparency in business transactions to avoid tax disputes and penalties.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237110</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>