<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (9) TMI 518 - CESTAT  NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237086</link>
    <description>The judgment upheld the impugned order, emphasizing compliance with duty payment regulations, particularly during forfeiture periods. It clarified the correct application of penalties under specific rules and highlighted the consequences of failing to pay duty consignment-wise through PLA. The modifications in penalty amounts reflected a balanced approach considering the case&#039;s circumstances.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Aug 2013 15:59:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=199493" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (9) TMI 518 - CESTAT  NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237086</link>
      <description>The judgment upheld the impugned order, emphasizing compliance with duty payment regulations, particularly during forfeiture periods. It clarified the correct application of penalties under specific rules and highlighted the consequences of failing to pay duty consignment-wise through PLA. The modifications in penalty amounts reflected a balanced approach considering the case&#039;s circumstances.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237086</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>