<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (9) TMI 512 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237080</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, classifying the services for Service Tax liability under Business Support Service instead of Business Auxiliary Service. Additionally, the Tribunal addressed a calculation error in the demand under GTA Service, directing the appellant to make a pre-deposit of Rs.2 lakhs by a specified date. Compliance with this directive would result in the waiver of the remaining dues and a stay on recovery during the appeal&#039;s pendency.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2017 14:58:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=199487" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (9) TMI 512 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237080</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, classifying the services for Service Tax liability under Business Support Service instead of Business Auxiliary Service. Additionally, the Tribunal addressed a calculation error in the demand under GTA Service, directing the appellant to make a pre-deposit of Rs.2 lakhs by a specified date. Compliance with this directive would result in the waiver of the remaining dues and a stay on recovery during the appeal&#039;s pendency.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237080</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>