<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (9) TMI 510 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237078</link>
    <description>The tribunal upheld the duty demand, interest, and penalties imposed on the appellants for violating conditions of duty exemption under Notification No.21/2002. The confiscation of the equipment under Section 111(o) of the Customs Act was also upheld. However, the redemption fine was reduced from Rs.90 lakhs to Rs.30 lakhs due to the equipment&#039;s use for road construction. Penalties imposed on the appellants and involved individuals were upheld as reasonable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Sep 2013 10:16:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=199485" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (9) TMI 510 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237078</link>
      <description>The tribunal upheld the duty demand, interest, and penalties imposed on the appellants for violating conditions of duty exemption under Notification No.21/2002. The confiscation of the equipment under Section 111(o) of the Customs Act was also upheld. However, the redemption fine was reduced from Rs.90 lakhs to Rs.30 lakhs due to the equipment&#039;s use for road construction. Penalties imposed on the appellants and involved individuals were upheld as reasonable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237078</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>