https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237067 The Tribunal upheld the demand of duty for the extended period of limitation, citing suppression of facts by the respondent with intent to evade duty. The setting aside of Rule 15 penalties was sustained, but the Section 11AC penalty imposed by the original authority was restored due to the respondent's failure to contest suppression allegations. Interest is payable under Section 11AB. The appeal was disposed of accordingly, with the Tribunal pronouncing the judgment in open court. en-us Thu, 31 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 17 Sep 2013 10:00:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237067 The Tribunal upheld the demand of duty for the extended period of limitation, citing suppression of facts by the respondent with intent to evade duty. The setting aside of Rule 15 penalties was sustained, but the Section 11AC penalty imposed by the original authority was restored due to the respondent's failure to contest suppression allegations. Interest is payable under Section 11AB. The appeal was disposed of accordingly, with the Tribunal pronouncing the judgment in open court. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 31 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237067