<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (9) TMI 475 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237043</link>
    <description>Capital gains under a development rights arrangement arise only when possession and effective control are handed over in part performance so that section 2(47)(v) read with section 53A applies; on the stated facts, the society retained control and the developer had not obtained possession or approvals, so no transfer occurred in the relevant year. Where the dispute concerns additional floor space index created by development regulations, and no ascertainable cost of acquisition is attributable, capital gains cannot be computed on a nil-cost asset; the section 50C valuation issue becomes irrelevant once chargeability itself fails.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 Jun 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Sep 2013 07:51:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=199450" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (9) TMI 475 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237043</link>
      <description>Capital gains under a development rights arrangement arise only when possession and effective control are handed over in part performance so that section 2(47)(v) read with section 53A applies; on the stated facts, the society retained control and the developer had not obtained possession or approvals, so no transfer occurred in the relevant year. Where the dispute concerns additional floor space index created by development regulations, and no ascertainable cost of acquisition is attributable, capital gains cannot be computed on a nil-cost asset; the section 50C valuation issue becomes irrelevant once chargeability itself fails.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Jun 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237043</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>