<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (9) TMI 453 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237021</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the benefit of exemption under Notification No. 67/95-C.E. for Naphtha used in the manufacture of fertilizers and electricity used in the manufacture of exempt goods (LPG and SKO). However, the exemption was denied for Naphtha used for generating electricity used for allied activities within the refinery. The appeals were allowed in part, setting aside the impugned orders to the extent of the allowed exemptions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 09 May 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Sep 2013 11:12:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=199428" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (9) TMI 453 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237021</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the benefit of exemption under Notification No. 67/95-C.E. for Naphtha used in the manufacture of fertilizers and electricity used in the manufacture of exempt goods (LPG and SKO). However, the exemption was denied for Naphtha used for generating electricity used for allied activities within the refinery. The appeals were allowed in part, setting aside the impugned orders to the extent of the allowed exemptions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 May 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237021</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>