<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (9) TMI 441 - ITAT AGRA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237009</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision in applying a 2% profit rate, rejecting the appeals by both the assessee and the Revenue. Additionally, the deletion of additions for bogus liabilities and various expenses was affirmed, with the Tribunal emphasizing the historical profit rates and the agreement by the assessee&#039;s counsel on the profit rate application.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Jun 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Sep 2013 08:23:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=199416" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (9) TMI 441 - ITAT AGRA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237009</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision in applying a 2% profit rate, rejecting the appeals by both the assessee and the Revenue. Additionally, the deletion of additions for bogus liabilities and various expenses was affirmed, with the Tribunal emphasizing the historical profit rates and the agreement by the assessee&#039;s counsel on the profit rate application.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Jun 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237009</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>