<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (9) TMI 436 - ITAT ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237004</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee, overturning the additions made by the Assessing Officer and confirmed by the CIT(A) regarding the cash flow statement, household expenses, undisclosed investment based on the DVO&#039;s report, and alleged investment in furniture and furnishings. The Tribunal found in favor of the assessee due to the provision of sufficient material and reasonable explanations, leading to the deletion of the aforementioned additions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 25 Jun 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Sep 2013 08:10:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=199411" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (9) TMI 436 - ITAT ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237004</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee, overturning the additions made by the Assessing Officer and confirmed by the CIT(A) regarding the cash flow statement, household expenses, undisclosed investment based on the DVO&#039;s report, and alleged investment in furniture and furnishings. The Tribunal found in favor of the assessee due to the provision of sufficient material and reasonable explanations, leading to the deletion of the aforementioned additions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Jun 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237004</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>