<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (9) TMI 434 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237002</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s claim for deduction under sections 80-I &amp;amp; 80-IA, reimbursement of interest on housing loans, interest on borrowings for a project, subsidy for gas connections to employees, and expenditure on festivals. However, the disallowance of diminution in share value was upheld. The issue of bad debts was remanded for further examination. Depreciation on leased assets was allowed, along with meter reading difference payment. The provision for rent payable was partly allowed. Penalty proceedings were canceled due to lack of willful negligence. The appeal in quantum proceedings was partly allowed, while the appeal in penalty proceedings was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 Jun 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Sep 2013 08:05:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=199409" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (9) TMI 434 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237002</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s claim for deduction under sections 80-I &amp;amp; 80-IA, reimbursement of interest on housing loans, interest on borrowings for a project, subsidy for gas connections to employees, and expenditure on festivals. However, the disallowance of diminution in share value was upheld. The issue of bad debts was remanded for further examination. Depreciation on leased assets was allowed, along with meter reading difference payment. The provision for rent payable was partly allowed. Penalty proceedings were canceled due to lack of willful negligence. The appeal in quantum proceedings was partly allowed, while the appeal in penalty proceedings was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Jun 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237002</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>