<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (9) TMI 433 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237001</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, deleting the addition of Rs. 2,18,50,000 under Section 68 of the Income Tax Act as unexplained cash credit. The Tribunal found the assessee had provided satisfactory evidence, shifting the burden to the Revenue, which failed to rebut the evidence. The Tribunal concluded that the addition was unjustified, emphasizing the independent source of funds and the lack of adverse material provided by the Revenue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 Jun 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Sep 2013 08:07:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=199408" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (9) TMI 433 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237001</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, deleting the addition of Rs. 2,18,50,000 under Section 68 of the Income Tax Act as unexplained cash credit. The Tribunal found the assessee had provided satisfactory evidence, shifting the burden to the Revenue, which failed to rebut the evidence. The Tribunal concluded that the addition was unjustified, emphasizing the independent source of funds and the lack of adverse material provided by the Revenue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Jun 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237001</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>