<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (9) TMI 421 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=236989</link>
    <description>A summary suit founded on a written acknowledgment and rescheduling agreement may proceed where the defendants fail to show a bona fide triable issue, and a sham or unsupported plea of fraud will not justify leave to defend. The continuing guarantee remained enforceable because the contractual documents preserved the guarantors&#039; liability despite indulgence to the principal debtor and expressly continued the guarantees until full payment, including after a guarantor&#039;s death. On that basis, the admitted liability was recoverable with contractual interest at the agreed rate until realization.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 13 Aug 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Sep 2013 10:37:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=199396" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (9) TMI 421 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=236989</link>
      <description>A summary suit founded on a written acknowledgment and rescheduling agreement may proceed where the defendants fail to show a bona fide triable issue, and a sham or unsupported plea of fraud will not justify leave to defend. The continuing guarantee remained enforceable because the contractual documents preserved the guarantors&#039; liability despite indulgence to the principal debtor and expressly continued the guarantees until full payment, including after a guarantor&#039;s death. On that basis, the admitted liability was recoverable with contractual interest at the agreed rate until realization.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 13 Aug 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=236989</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>