<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (9) TMI 413 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=236981</link>
    <description>Interest on wrongly taken Cenvat credit depends on the statutory regime in force. For periods before 1-4-2000, the rules did not permit interest merely because credit was wrongly taken; interest arose only when the credit was actually utilised, so no interest was payable for that earlier period. From 1-4-2000 until reversal, interest was payable under the amended framework. Penalty under Rule 173Q was linked to intent to evade duty, and the same culpable element governed the penal field under Section 11AC. As the credit was reversed when pointed out and no intent to evade was established, penalty was not sustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 16 Nov 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 14 Sep 2013 11:30:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=199388" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (9) TMI 413 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=236981</link>
      <description>Interest on wrongly taken Cenvat credit depends on the statutory regime in force. For periods before 1-4-2000, the rules did not permit interest merely because credit was wrongly taken; interest arose only when the credit was actually utilised, so no interest was payable for that earlier period. From 1-4-2000 until reversal, interest was payable under the amended framework. Penalty under Rule 173Q was linked to intent to evade duty, and the same culpable element governed the penal field under Section 11AC. As the credit was reversed when pointed out and no intent to evade was established, penalty was not sustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Nov 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=236981</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>