<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (9) TMI 406 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=236974</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the revenue&#039;s appeal for statistical purposes, directing the Assessing Officer to conduct a thorough investigation and re-adjudicate the case to determine the eligibility of the deduction under section 80IC of the Income Tax Act. The Tribunal found discrepancies in the evidence presented and raised doubts about the genuineness of the manufacturing activities at the Parwanoo unit, emphasizing the need for further inquiry and clarification.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 23 Aug 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Aug 2016 10:29:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=199381" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (9) TMI 406 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=236974</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the revenue&#039;s appeal for statistical purposes, directing the Assessing Officer to conduct a thorough investigation and re-adjudicate the case to determine the eligibility of the deduction under section 80IC of the Income Tax Act. The Tribunal found discrepancies in the evidence presented and raised doubts about the genuineness of the manufacturing activities at the Parwanoo unit, emphasizing the need for further inquiry and clarification.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Aug 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=236974</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>