<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (9) TMI 397 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=236965</link>
    <description>The tribunal set aside the Commissioner of Income-tax&#039;s order, determining that the Assessing Officer&#039;s order was not erroneous or prejudicial to Revenue. The tribunal upheld the validity of the BOT asset transfer and the exemption under Section 47(iv). The appeal was allowed, and the Rs. 125 crores received by the assessee was not taxable as income from other sources.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 Mar 2016 15:26:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=199372" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (9) TMI 397 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=236965</link>
      <description>The tribunal set aside the Commissioner of Income-tax&#039;s order, determining that the Assessing Officer&#039;s order was not erroneous or prejudicial to Revenue. The tribunal upheld the validity of the BOT asset transfer and the exemption under Section 47(iv). The appeal was allowed, and the Rs. 125 crores received by the assessee was not taxable as income from other sources.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=236965</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>