<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (9) TMI 394 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=236962</link>
    <description>The Tribunal found that the adjudicating authority failed to comply with its directions and lacked independent analysis. The adjudication order was quashed, and the matter was remanded for fresh adjudication within eight weeks, in strict compliance with the Tribunal&#039;s earlier judgment. The appellant&#039;s appeal was allowed, with no costs awarded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 31 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 Feb 2017 12:47:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=199369" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (9) TMI 394 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=236962</link>
      <description>The Tribunal found that the adjudicating authority failed to comply with its directions and lacked independent analysis. The adjudication order was quashed, and the matter was remanded for fresh adjudication within eight weeks, in strict compliance with the Tribunal&#039;s earlier judgment. The appellant&#039;s appeal was allowed, with no costs awarded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 31 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=236962</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>