<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (9) TMI 390 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=236958</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, setting aside the judgment that disqualified the Appellant-company for not submitting its latest Income Tax Return. The Court held that the non-compliance with clause (j) was not significant enough to reject the bid and directed the Respondents to reconsider the bid. Each party was ordered to bear its own costs. The Court emphasized the importance of following legal principles in tender disputes and highlighted the need for adherence to tender rules to ensure fairness and transparency.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 11 Sep 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Nov 2017 10:25:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=199365" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (9) TMI 390 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=236958</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, setting aside the judgment that disqualified the Appellant-company for not submitting its latest Income Tax Return. The Court held that the non-compliance with clause (j) was not significant enough to reject the bid and directed the Respondents to reconsider the bid. Each party was ordered to bear its own costs. The Court emphasized the importance of following legal principles in tender disputes and highlighted the need for adherence to tender rules to ensure fairness and transparency.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 Sep 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=236958</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>