<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (9) TMI 366 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=236934</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, granting the deduction under Section 80IB(10) for the entire housing project, including the disputed flats. The delay in filing the appeal was condoned due to professional advice, and the balcony areas were deemed common areas, not to be included in the built-up area calculation. The decision aimed to support housing projects and interpret tax provisions in line with their intended purpose.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 Mar 2016 11:54:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=199341" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (9) TMI 366 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=236934</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, granting the deduction under Section 80IB(10) for the entire housing project, including the disputed flats. The delay in filing the appeal was condoned due to professional advice, and the balcony areas were deemed common areas, not to be included in the built-up area calculation. The decision aimed to support housing projects and interpret tax provisions in line with their intended purpose.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=236934</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>