<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (9) TMI 359 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=236926</link>
    <description>The Tribunal granted waiver and stay for the demand related to the dredging service due to the appellant&#039;s evidence and reliance on legal precedent, finding in favor of the appellant. However, the Tribunal denied the same for the demand related to irregular CENVAT credit, citing lack of legal support and a valid plea of limitation raised by the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Sep 2013 10:52:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=199333" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (9) TMI 359 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=236926</link>
      <description>The Tribunal granted waiver and stay for the demand related to the dredging service due to the appellant&#039;s evidence and reliance on legal precedent, finding in favor of the appellant. However, the Tribunal denied the same for the demand related to irregular CENVAT credit, citing lack of legal support and a valid plea of limitation raised by the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=236926</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>