<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (9) TMI 350 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=236917</link>
    <description>Imported goods declared as recycled base oil could not be recharacterised as virgin base oil on the basis of a tentative chemical examiner&#039;s report. The report was not conclusive, and the evidence from cross-examination showed no established technical specifications for distinguishing virgin from recycled base oil. As the supplier&#039;s invoice, packing list and certificate consistently described the goods as recycled base oil, and no independent material rebutted that description, the declared transaction value could not be displaced. The enhancement of assessable value was therefore unsustainable, and the impugned order was set aside with consequential relief.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 29 Aug 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 Sep 2013 10:44:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=199324" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (9) TMI 350 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=236917</link>
      <description>Imported goods declared as recycled base oil could not be recharacterised as virgin base oil on the basis of a tentative chemical examiner&#039;s report. The report was not conclusive, and the evidence from cross-examination showed no established technical specifications for distinguishing virgin from recycled base oil. As the supplier&#039;s invoice, packing list and certificate consistently described the goods as recycled base oil, and no independent material rebutted that description, the declared transaction value could not be displaced. The enhancement of assessable value was therefore unsustainable, and the impugned order was set aside with consequential relief.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Aug 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=236917</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>