<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (9) TMI 347 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=236914</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal for statistical purposes, directing specific issues to be reconsidered by the CIT (A). The Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed, affirming the CIT (A)&#039;s computation of income and profit from the project. The Tribunal upheld the method used by the CIT (A) in considering the entire contract amount and closing work-in-progress for determining the profit. The order was pronounced on 22.3.2013.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 22 Mar 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 Sep 2013 11:57:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=199321" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (9) TMI 347 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=236914</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal for statistical purposes, directing specific issues to be reconsidered by the CIT (A). The Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed, affirming the CIT (A)&#039;s computation of income and profit from the project. The Tribunal upheld the method used by the CIT (A) in considering the entire contract amount and closing work-in-progress for determining the profit. The order was pronounced on 22.3.2013.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Mar 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=236914</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>