<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (9) TMI 345 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=236912</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that a unit availing exemption under Notification No. 56/2002-C.E. cannot utilize BED Credit for payment of education cess and S &amp;amp; H Cess. The diversion of BED Credit for these cesses would result in excess BED paid through PLA, which would not be refundable under the notification. The Tribunal set aside the Commissioner (Appeals)&#039; orders and reinstated the original adjudicating authority&#039;s orders, ruling in favor of the Revenue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 19 Sep 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2014 16:01:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=199319" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (9) TMI 345 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=236912</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that a unit availing exemption under Notification No. 56/2002-C.E. cannot utilize BED Credit for payment of education cess and S &amp;amp; H Cess. The diversion of BED Credit for these cesses would result in excess BED paid through PLA, which would not be refundable under the notification. The Tribunal set aside the Commissioner (Appeals)&#039; orders and reinstated the original adjudicating authority&#039;s orders, ruling in favor of the Revenue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Sep 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=236912</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>